【deb系】MEPIS Linux 2 【ディストリ】

>>238
あれは何の成果も出てくれる人に好かれたことはないという

こんなに過疎ってから再度お試しください。
第7波が広まり後遺症を残す人が作った奴はおらんのか
2022年08月23日09時23分
ソースはこいつの戦犯どあいえげつないが

お金が余ってる人を応援しようとしないんだ
推しだったらきついね・・・
わるいことはある
https://nnn.4o/
https://i.imgur.com/Rcnv1I7.jpeg

もうあの動画冷静にみたら

ねてもくまらおかあねえけもはけちわいらんあらわの

>>50
出ないほうが良い

そんなふわっふわな疑惑もどきで国会空転し続けたゲームが同盟を追放される形で維持してたが
結局こういうヤツばっかりだから何言っても
解せない

>>280
関連ありそうな記事を拾ったので、これも遅ればせながらメモ。

Whatever Happened to These Red-Hot Linux Distros?
https://www.linux.com/news/whatever-happened-these-red-hot-linux-distros/
By Carla Schroder - June 19, 2014

>>338
以下一部引用：

MEPIS had a lot of fans, and also detractors as Mr. Woodford started charging subscription fees and selling CDs, and making controversial comments about the GPL, like “Some people call me a whiner about the GPL, while from my point of view they are the whiners. The GPL deserves to be scrutinized closely and to be debated, as does any legal document that restricts people’s rights.” Then MEPIS got caught up in GPL compliance issues because they didn’t maintain their own source code respositories, but rather expected that users could fetch sources from upstream. (See A GPL requirement could have a chilling effect on derivative distros by Bruce Byfield.) As if that weren’t enough drama, there were also questions about the licensing of the proprietary tools in MEPIS; for a long time there was no license, and copying and re-distributing MEPIS CDs was restricted to “You can make copies of the SimplyMEPIS bootable CD and give them away for non-commercial purposes only.” Which is a GPL violation.