>>121
> DSC 1 says we will never "require the use of a non-free component". To me,
> this is the major relevant issue.
>
> Proposals B and C offer users the explicit choice of media. That feels
> clearly compatible with the DSC, as users are not required to use non-free
> bits.
>
> Proposal A will use non-free-firmware by default, but "where possible...will
> include ways for users to disable this". Without the "where possible", I
> think this opt-out is compatible with the DSC. However, if it is not
> possible to disable the non-free-firmware, then it feels like the system is,
> in fact, requiring it. Thus this option, as worded, feels potentially
> incompatible with the DSC.

ttps://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2022/09/msg00008.html

やっぱりもめてるんだよな。デビアン社会契約（DSC）が浮上してきた。